Judy Wajcman

Judy Wajcman
	;
Biografia
Naixement	12 desembre 1950 (73 anys); Austràlia
Activitat
Ocupació	sociòloga, professora d'universitat
Ocupador	London School of Economics (2009–2022); Universitat Nacional Australiana (–2009); London Business School
Interessada en	Estudis socials de la tecnologia
Obra
	Obres destacables TechnoFeminism
Estudiant doctoral	Isabell Loeschner (en)
	Premis (2018) OII Lifetime Achievement Award; (2016) Membre de l'Acadèmia Britànica; (2015) doctor honoris causa per la Universitat de Ginebra; (1997) Membre de l'Acadèmia de les Ciències Socials a Austràlia ;

Judy Wajcman (12 de desembre de 1950) és una professora de sociologia de la London School of Economics.^[1]^[2] Anteriorment va ser professora de sociologia a l'Escola de Recerca de Ciències Socials de la Universitat Nacional Australiana. Ha estat professora visitant al Lehman Brothers Centre for Women in Business de la London Business School, i a l'Oxford Internet Institute. Ha ocupat anteriorment càrrecs a Cambridge, Edimburg, Manchester, Sydney, Tòquio, Viena, Warwick i Zuric. També ha estat professora convidada a l'All Souls College (Oxford). Va ser la primera dona membre del St. John's College de Cambridge (Norman Laski Research Fellow 1978-1980). Entre 2010 i 2011 va presidir la Society for Social Studies of Science i encara és membre del seu Handbook Committee.

Wajcman és probablement coneguda pel seu anàlisi de la visió de gènere de la tecnologia.^[3] Va ser una autora primerenca sobre els estudis socials de la tecnologia, així com els estudis de gènere, el treball i les organitzacions.^[4]^[5]

↑ «Wajcman, Judy». Library of Congress. [Consulta: 13 febrer 2015]. «Sources: found: The Social shaping of technology, 1998: CIP t.p. (Judy Wajcman, Sch. Soc., Aust. Nat. Univ.) data sheet (b. 12/12/50)»
↑ «Wajcman, Judy». London School of Economics and Political Science. [Consulta: 10 juny 2015].
↑ Wajcman, Judy. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (volume 9). Amsterdam New York: Elsevier, 2001, p. 5976-5979. ISBN 9780080430768. «Gender and technology»
↑ Major, Debra A.; Burke, Ronald J. Handbook of work-life integration of professionals: challenges and opportunities. Cheltenham, UK Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar, 2013, p. xv. ISBN 9781781009284. «Contributors»
↑ Lyon, Stina «Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism, by Judy Wajcman (book review)». Times Higher Education. TES Global, 22-01-2015 [Consulta: 10 juny 2015]. «Her most significant message, however, relates to gender. Earlier work on the relationship between modernity, technology and time pressures engendered by the commodification of labour focused largely on men, as employers, capitalists and worker-employees, and thus on the labour process in the public domain of production, and not on the interrelated difficulties in "doing domestic time" in care, child-rearing and home maintenance.»

[Congress-1] «Wajcman, Judy». Library of Congress. [Consulta: 13 febrer 2015]. «Sources: found: The Social shaping of technology, 1998: CIP t.p. (Judy Wajcman, Sch. Soc., Aust. Nat. Univ.) data sheet (b. 12/12/50)»

[2] «Wajcman, Judy». London School of Economics and Political Science. [Consulta: 10 juny 2015].

[3] Wajcman, Judy. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (volume 9). Amsterdam New York: Elsevier, 2001, p. 5976-5979. ISBN 9780080430768. «Gender and technology»

[4] Major, Debra A.; Burke, Ronald J. Handbook of work-life integration of professionals: challenges and opportunities. Cheltenham, UK Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar, 2013, p. xv. ISBN 9781781009284. «Contributors»

[5] Lyon, Stina «Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism, by Judy Wajcman (book review)». Times Higher Education. TES Global, 22-01-2015 [Consulta: 10 juny 2015]. «Her most significant message, however, relates to gender. Earlier work on the relationship between modernity, technology and time pressures engendered by the commodification of labour focused largely on men, as employers, capitalists and worker-employees, and thus on the labour process in the public domain of production, and not on the interrelated difficulties in "doing domestic time" in care, child-rearing and home maintenance.»

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]