Al-Kateb v Godwin

Al-Kateb v Godwin
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Full case nameAl-Kateb v Godwin & Ors
Decided6 August 2004
Citation(s)[2004] HCA 37, (2004) 219 CLR 562
Transcript(s)[2003] HCATrans 456 (12 November 2003), [2003] HCATrans 458 (13 November 2003)
Case history
Prior action(s)SHDB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 30; SHDB v Godwin [2003] FCA 300
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingGleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Callinan & Heydon JJ
Case opinions
(4:3) The Migration Act,[1] authorises unlawful non-citizens to be detained until they are removed from Australia, even when there is no prospect of their removal in the reasonably foreseeable future (per McHugh, Hayne, Callinan & Heydon JJ)

(4:1) The detention of non-citizens by the Executive pursuant to ss 189, 196 and 198 did not contravene Ch III of the Commonwealth Constitution, even if the removal of the non-citizen from Australia was not reasonably practicable in the foreseeable future. (per McHugh, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ)

(2:1) The provisions of the Migration Act should not be interpreted by reference to international law (per Hayne & Callinan JJ; Kirby J dissenting)
Laws applied
Overruled by
NZYQ v Minister for Immigration

Al-Kateb v Godwin,[2] was a decision of the High Court of Australia, which ruled on 6 August 2004 that the indefinite detention of a stateless person was lawful. The case concerned Ahmed Al-Kateb, a Palestinian man born in Kuwait, who moved to Australia in 2000 and applied for a temporary protection visa. The Commonwealth Minister for Immigration's decision to refuse the application was upheld by the Refugee Review Tribunal and the Federal Court. In 2002, Al-Kateb declared that he wished to return to Kuwait or Gaza.[3] However, since no country would accept Al-Kateb, he was declared stateless and detained under the policy of mandatory detention.

The two main issues considered by the High Court were whether the Migration Act 1958 (the legislation governing immigration to Australia) permitted a person in Al-Kateb's situation to be detained indefinitely, and if so, whether this was permissible under the Constitution of Australia. A majority of the court decided that the Act did allow indefinite detention, and that the Act was not unconstitutional.

The controversy surrounding the outcome of the case resulted in a review of the circumstances of twenty-four stateless people in immigration detention. Al-Kateb and 8 other stateless people were granted bridging visas in 2005 and while this meant they were released from detention, they were unable to work, study or obtain various government benefits.[4] Al-Kateb was granted a permanent visa in October 2007.[5]

In 2023, a subsequent High Court case, NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, overturned this decision.[6]

  1. ^ Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference clr was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commissions Legal Bulletin. Aug-Oct 2004, Volume 10 [1] Archived 2006-09-20 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference AI life sentence was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference Marr was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ Karp, Paul (8 November 2023). "Indefinite immigration detention ruled unlawful in landmark Australian high court decision". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 8 November 2023.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search