Brussels effect

The Berlaymont building in Brussels, the headquarters of the European Commission

The Brussels effect is the process of European Union (EU) regulations spreading well beyond the EU's borders. Through the Brussels effect, regulated entities, especially corporations, end up complying with EU laws even outside the EU for a variety of reasons. The effect is named after the city of Brussels, the de facto capital of the European Union, used as a metonym for the European Union.

The combination of market size, market importance,[1] relatively stringent standards and regulatory capacity[2] of the European Union can have the effect that firms trading internationally find that it is not economically, legally or technically practical to maintain lower standards in non-EU markets. Non-EU companies exporting globally can find that it is beneficial to adopt standards set in Brussels uniformly throughout their business.[3][4]

The California effect and the Brussels effect are a form of "race to the top" where the most stringent standard has an appeal to companies operating across multiple regulatory environments as it makes global production and exports easier.[5][6][7] The effects are the opposite of the Delaware effect, a race to the bottom where jurisdictions can purposefully choose to lower their regulatory requirements in an attempt to attract businesses looking for the least stringent standard.[8]

Scholars could so far not empirically verify the limits of the Brussels effect in international law, especially World Trade Organization (WTO) law.[9] Furthermore, for the Brussels effect to occur, it was shown that not all prerequisites identified by Bradford have to occur cumulatively.[9] Research has indicated that the EU's regulatory power varies substantially depending on the context of the regulation involved.[10][11]

  1. ^ Bradford, Anu (2012). "The Brussels Effect". Northwestern University Law Review (PDF). Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 533. 107 (1). SSRN 2770634.
  2. ^ Bach, David; Newman, Abraham (2007). "The European regulatory state and global public policy: micro-institutions, macro-influence". Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501760701497659.
  3. ^ "The Brussels Effect: The Rise of a Regulatory Superstate in Europe". Columbia Law School. 8 January 2013. Archived from the original on 4 May 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  4. ^ "Hot U.S. Import: European Regulations". The Wall Street Journal. 7 May 2018.
  5. ^ "Why the 'Brussels effect' will undermine Brexit regulatory push". Financial Times. July 2017.
  6. ^ "Why the whole world feels the 'Brussels effect'". Financial Times. November 2017.
  7. ^ Bach, David (25 May 2018). "Three Questions: Prof. David Bach on the Reach of European Privacy Regulations". Yale Insights.
  8. ^ Wright, Robert E. (8 June 2012). "How Delaware Became the King of U.S. Corporate Charters". Bloomberg View. Archived from the original on 16 March 2016. Retrieved 18 May 2018.
  9. ^ a b Sinopoli, Dominique; Purnhagen, Kai (2016). "Reversed Harmonization or Horizontalization of EU standards?: Does WTO Law Facilitate or Contrain the Brussels Effect?". Wisconsin International Law Journal: 92–119.
  10. ^ Young, Alasdair R. "The European Union as a global regulator? Context and comparison." Journal of European Public Policy 22, no. 9 (2015): 1233-1252.
  11. ^ Young, Alasdair R. "Europe as a global regulator? The limits of EU influence in international food safety standards." Journal of European Public Policy 21, no. 6 (2014): 904-922.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search