Burrage v. United States

Burrage v. United States
Argued November 12, 2013
Decided January 27, 2014
Full case nameMarcus Andrew Burrage, Petitioner v. United States
Docket no.12-7515
Citations571 U.S. 204 (more)
134 S. Ct. 881; 187 L. Ed. 2d 715; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 797; 82 U.S.L.W. 4076
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
Prior687 F.3d 1015 (reversed and remanded)
Holding
At least when the use of a drug distributed by the defendant is not an independently sufficient cause of the victim's death or serious bodily injury, a defendant cannot be liable for penalty enhancement under the penalty enhancement provision of the Controlled Substance Act unless such use is a but-for cause of the death or injury. Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Kagan; Alito (all but Part III–B)
ConcurrenceGinsburg (in judgment), joined by Sotomayor
Laws applied
Controlled Substances Act

Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a unanimous Court held that a defendant cannot be liable for penalty enhancement under the penalty enhancement provision of the Controlled Substances Act unless such use is a but-for cause of the death or injury, at least when the use of a drug distributed by the defendant is not an independently sufficient cause of the victim's death or serious bodily injury.[1][2][3]

  1. ^ Burrage v. United States, No. 12-7515, 571 U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 881 (2014).
  2. ^ The Oyez Project: Burrage v. United States
  3. ^ Rodgers, Grant (January 27, 2014). "U.S. Supreme Court throws out conviction of Iowa drug dealer". The Des Moines Register. Retrieved July 2, 2014.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search