Burt v. Titlow

Burt v. Titlow
Argued October 8, 2013
Decided November 5, 2013
Full case nameSherry L. Burt, Warden, Petitioner v. Vonlee Nicole Titlow
Docket no.12-414
Citations571 U.S. 12 (more)
134 S. Ct. 10; 187 L. Ed. 2d 348; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8039; 82 U.S.L.W. 4007
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
PriorLeave to appeal denied by Michigan Supreme Court, People v. Titlow, 470 Mich. 867, 680 N.W.2d 900 (2004); 480 Mich. 890, 738 N.W.2d 715 (2007); habeas corpus petition denied, Titlow v. Burt, No. 2:07-cv-13614 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 19, 2010), reversed, 680 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2012); cert. granted, 568 U.S. 1191 (2013).
Holding
Federal Courts must defer to a State Court's finding of fact as long as their judgement is reasonable.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityAlito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
ConcurrenceSotomayor
ConcurrenceGinsburg (in judgment)
Laws applied
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

Burt v. Titlow, 571 U.S. 12 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a state court makes a factual determination the federal courts must defer to its judgment so long as it is reasonable.[1]

  1. ^ Burt v. Titlow, 571 U.S. 12.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search