California v. Carney | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued October 30, 1984 Decided May 13, 1985 | |
Full case name | California v. Carney |
Citations | 471 U.S. 386 (more) 105 S. Ct. 2066; 85 L. Ed. 2d 406; 53 U.S.L.W. 4521 |
Case history | |
Prior | 34 Cal. 3d 597, 668 P.2d 807 (Cal. 1983) (reversed and remanded) |
Holding | |
A motor home is subject to the automobile exception to the 4th Amendment search warrant requirement because it is readily movable. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Burger, joined by White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV |
California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a motor home was subject to the automobile exception to the search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the motor home was readily movable.
The dissent argues that this is contrary to the bright line rule established in Katz v. United States and that the majority opinion violates the protection of privacy rights provided by the Fourth Amendment.[1]
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search