Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams

Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams
Argued November 6, 2000
Decided March 21, 2001
Full case nameCircuit City Stores, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Saint Clair Adams
Citations532 U.S. 105 (more)
121 S. Ct. 1302; 149 L. Ed. 2d 234
Case history
Priorstay of state proceedings ordered and arbitration compelled, unreported (N.D. Cal., 1998); reversed and remanded, 194 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 1999); cert. granted, 529 U.S. 1129 (2000).
Subsequentreversed and remanded on different ground, 279 F.3d 889 (9th Cir. 2002)
Holding
The Federal Arbitration Act's exception of "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or other classes of workers engaged in interstate commerce" does not apply to general employment contracts.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas
DissentStevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer; Souter (Parts II and III)
DissentSouter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
Laws applied
Federal Arbitration Act

Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case that concerned whether the "section one exemption" of the Federal Arbitration Act applied to an employment contract of an employee at Circuit City Stores. The Court held that the exemption was limited to the specific listing of professions contained in the text. This decision meant that general employment contracts, like the one Adams sued under, would have to be arbitrated in accordance with the federal statute.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search