![]() | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(June 2021) |
Part of the politics series on |
Neoliberalism |
---|
Part of a series on |
Capitalism |
---|
Part of a series on |
Marxism |
---|
![]() |
Outline of Marxism |
Creative destruction (German: schöpferische Zerstörung) is a concept in economics that describes a process in which new innovations replace and make obsolete older innovations.[1]
The concept is usually identified with the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter,[2][3][4] who derived it from the work of Karl Marx and popularized it as a theory of economic innovation and the business cycle. It is also sometimes known as Schumpeter's gale. In Marxian economic theory, the concept refers more broadly to the linked processes of the accumulation and annihilation of wealth under capitalism.[5][6][7]
The German sociologist Werner Sombart has been credited[4] with the first use of these terms in his work Krieg und Kapitalismus (War and Capitalism, 1913).[8] In the earlier work of Marx, however, the idea of creative destruction or annihilation (German: Vernichtung) implies not only that capitalism destroys and reconfigures previous economic orders, but also that it must continuously devalue existing wealth (whether through war, dereliction, or regular and periodic economic crises) in order to clear the ground for the creation of new wealth.[5][6][7]
In Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942), Joseph Schumpeter developed the concept out of a careful reading of Marx's thought. In contrast with Marx - who argued that the creative-destructive forces unleashed by capitalism would eventually lead to its demise as a system - Schumpeter reinforced the evolutionary nature of capitalist economies, downplaying the concerns of static competition analysis (i.e., market concentration), and reinforcing the importance of dynamic competition analysis (i.e., threat of entry, new technologies and means of production, competition in dimensions different than price). In his words, "This process of Creative Destruction is the essential fact about capitalism. It is what capitalism consists in and what every capitalist concern has got to live in [...] The problem that is usually being visualized is how capitalism administers existing structures, whereas the relevant problem is how it creates and destroys them. As long as this is not recognized, the investigator does a meaningless job. As soon as it is recognized, his outlook on capitalist practice and its social results changes considerably."[9] Despite this, the term subsequently gained popularity within mainstream economics as a description of processes such as downsizing to increase the efficiency and dynamism of a company. The Marxian usage has, however, been retained and further developed in the work of social scientists such as David Harvey,[10] Marshall Berman,[11] Manuel Castells[12] and Daniele Archibugi.[13]
In modern economics, creative destruction is one of the central concepts in the endogenous growth theory.[14] In Why Nations Fail, a popular book on long-term economic development, Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue the major reason countries stagnate and go into decline is the willingness of the ruling elites to block creative destruction, a beneficial process that promotes innovation.[15]
{{cite book}}
: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search