| Submission declined on 1 August 2024 by Mgp28 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
Comment: None of the sources provide sufficient evidence to show that this subject warrants an article. The Vice article only has one or two sentences about him. The rest of the sources are written by him or are pages from his university's website. I have removed some sentences that were directly copied from reference 8. Although the citation was given, you still need to write the explanation in your own words (see WP:Copy-paste). Also, there is lots of unnecessary duplication in the references. I have removed one duplicate, but (as currently numbered) 5, 6 and 7 all refer to the same book, and number 4 is just a link to number 3. Mgp28 (talk) 17:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Christopher Plenzich is a Montreal, Quebec-based artist and researcher known for his unique approach to art and science.[1][2] His work has been featured in various media outlets, including a notable feature in a VICE article.[3][4]
- ^ "Lights, camera, caterpillars! Can Christopher Plenzich's research video win NSERC's national award? - Concordia University". www.concordia.ca. Retrieved 2024-04-17.
- ^ QCBS. "QCBS - Emma Despland". Retrieved April 17, 2024.
- ^ Nunes, Andrew (2017-02-27). "This Is What Happens When Humans Use Animals to Make Art". Vice. Retrieved 2024-04-17.
- ^ "Christopher Plenzich". www.vice.com. Retrieved 2024-04-17.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search