 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,193 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 2 March 2025 by Qcne (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 29 January 2025 by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by AlphaBetaGamma 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 26 January 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 3 months ago. | |
Ido Pieter Vunderink (9 May 1935 – 22 July 2021) was a Dutch painter, textile designer, and cynologist.[1] Vunderink created works that explored themes of nature, identity, and spirituality.[2] His artistic techniques involved the use of thick impasto and large palette knives, which provided his paintings with texture and depth.[3]
Vunderink’s art received recognition both locally and internationally. Much of his work remains connected to his personal life experiences.[4] His identity as a neurodivergent individual and as a gay man in a time of limited societal acceptance influenced his creative output, reflecting the struggles of those who feel marginalized or misunderstood.
- ^ Straus, Cees (1999). Ido Vunderink. Nieuwkoop: D-Books International Publications. p. 13. ISBN 9053493034.
- ^ Sneijder, Rik (2021) [July 31, 2021]. "Ido Vunderink (86), schilder van het Groene Hart, overleden". Algemeen Dagblad. Retrieved 2025-01-28.
- ^ Oliver, Teresa (2021). "A day with Ido". Vol. 49, no. 49. The Kolmarian. pp. 26–27.
- ^ Lander, Frans (2005). Ido Vunderink: The Image of The Imperceptible. Woerden: Staadmuseum Woerden Publications. p. 25. ISBN 9080839337.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.