Submission declined on 10 July 2024 by Mgp28 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 10 December 2023 by Qcne (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Qcne 7 months ago. | ![]() |
Megan A. K. Peters | |
---|---|
Nationality | American |
Education | B.S. Cognitive Science M.A. Psychology: Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Ph.D. Psychology: Computational Cognitive Neuroscience |
Alma mater | Brown University (2006) University of California, Los Angeles (2010-2014) |
Website | https://faculty.sites.uci.edu/cnclab/ |
Megan Amelia Knapp Peters is an American cognitive neuroscientist and computational neuroscientist and science communicator. Her work asks how the human brain can be responsible for creating or supporting subjective experience by investigating conscious versus unconscious perception, metacognition, and computational models. Her primary appointment is as Associate Professor in the University of California, Irvine's Department of Cognitive Sciences. She is also a Fellow in the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Brain, Mind, and Consciousness program[1] and a Scialog Fellow in the Research Corporation for Science Advancement Molecular Basis of Cognition program[2]. She is also known for her role as co-founder, President, and Chairperson of the Board of Directors at Neuromatch.[3]
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.