 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,489 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 3 June 2024 by TheTechie (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 16 May 2024 by Bearcat (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Bearcat 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 6 March 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Theroadislong 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 6 March 2024 by Umakant Bhalerao (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Umakant Bhalerao 4 months ago. | |
Comment: This is referenced far too heavily to primary sources that are not support for notability at all (e.g. business directories, the self-published websites of organizations directly affiliated with the statement, etc.), and shows very little evidence of WP:GNG-building coverage about the company in reliable sources. We're not just looking for technical verification of facts here, we're looking for evidence that the facts led other unaffiliated people to write third party content covering and analyzing the facts as journalism and/or in books. Bearcat (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You cannot cite Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia, please remove them to help cut down the (frankly ridiculous levels of) WP:REFBOMBING. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
| Moriyama Teshima Architects | |
|---|---|
| Practice information | |
| Founded | 1958 |
Moriyama Teshima Architects (MTA), formerly Moriyama & Teshima Architects, is a Canadian architectural practice with offices in Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario.[1] MTA has completed projects in North America, Europe, and Asia.[2] The firm's portfolio includes museums, libraries, educational facilities, corporate and government headquarters, recreational centers, and work on restoration, renovation, and campus planning.[3]
Moriyama Teshima Architects is recognized as a notable Canadian practice, having been the recipient of six Governor General's Awards for Architecture.[4]
- ^ "Moriyama & Teshima Architects Company Profile". Dun & Bradstreet. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
- ^ "2023 RAIC Research & Innovation in Architecture Award". April 4, 2023.
- ^ "ArchDaily Moriyama Teshima Architects". Retrieved March 6, 2024.
- ^ "Governor General's Medals in Architecture - Past Recipients - RAIC". October 15, 2014. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search