Dubin v. United States

Dubin v. United States
Argued February 27, 2023
Decided June 8, 2023
Full case nameDavid Fox Dubin v. United States
Docket no.22-10
Citations599 U.S. 110 (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
PriorUnited States v. Dubin, 27 F.4th 1021 (5th Cir. 2021)(en banc), United States v. Dubin 982 F.3d 318 (5th Cir. 2020)., United States v. Dubin (No. 17-cr-00227-XR-2) (W.D. Tex. 2018)
Questions presented
Whether a person commits aggravated identity theft any time he mentions or otherwise recites someone else's name while committing a predicate offense.
Holding
Under §1028A(a)(1), a defendant “uses” another person’s means of identification “in relation to” a predicate offense when the use is at the crux of what makes the conduct criminal.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
MajoritySotomayor, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson
ConcurrenceGorsuch (in judgment)
Laws applied
18 U.S.C. § 1028A

Dubin v. United States, 599 U.S. 110 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case pertaining to a provision of Title 18 of the United States Code. In the case, the Court settled a circuit split regarding the reach of the federal aggravated identity theft statute.[1][failed verification]

  1. ^ "Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Broad Sweep of Identity Theft Law". New York Times. February 27, 2023. Retrieved August 4, 2023.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search