This article is part of a series on |
Alternative medicine |
---|
New Age beliefs List of New Age topics |
---|
Concepts |
Spiritual practices |
Doctrines |
Energy medicine is a branch of alternative medicine based on a pseudo-scientific belief that healers can channel "healing energy" into a patient and effect positive results. The field is defined by shared beliefs and practices relating to mysticism and esotericism in the wider alternative medicine sphere rather than any sort of unified terminology, leading to terms such as energy healing or vibrational medicine being used as synonymous or alternative names. In most cases there is no empirically measurable energy involved: the term refers instead to so-called subtle energy. Practitioners may classify the practice as hands-on,[1] hands-off,[1] and distant[1] (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations. Many schools of energy healing exist using many names: for example, biofield energy healing,[2][3] spiritual healing,[4] contact healing, distant healing, therapeutic touch,[5] Reiki[6] or Qigong.[2]
Reviews of the scientific literature on energy healing have concluded that there is no evidence supporting clinical efficacy.[7][8][9][10][11][12] The theoretical basis of healing has been criticised as implausible;[13][14][15][16] research and reviews supportive of energy medicine have been faulted for containing methodological flaws[17][18][19] and selection bias,[17][18] and positive therapeutic results have been determined to result from known psychological mechanisms.[17][18] Some claims of those purveying "energy medicine" devices are known to be fraudulent[20] and their marketing practices have drawn law-enforcement action in the US.[20]
...When faith healings have been diligently investigated by qualified doctors, they have found no evidence that the patients were actually helped in any objective sense. Even at Lourdes, the Catholic Church has only recognized 4 cures since 1978, out of 5 million people who seek healing there every year. There simply is no evidence that faith healing heals. Not what science considers evidence. And the true believers don't value evidence or the scientific method: for them, belief is enough.
Abbot
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Since the publication of our previous systematic review in 2000, several rigorous new studies have emerged. Collectively they shift the weight of the evidence against the notion that distant healing is more than a placebo.
ernst2006
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Pittler
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).TrickOrTreatment
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).GistLubin
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).AAQM
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).stenger
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Kruglyakov
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).SeattleTimes
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search