^Cite error: The named reference Cesaire1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^Hannah Arendt. Origins of Totalitarianism (1955). 1962 edition, page 174.
Full quote with footnote:
“It would be absurd to ask people to be reliable who by their very convictions must justify any given situation. It must be conceded that up to the time when the Nazis, in establishing themselves as a race-elite, frankly bestowed their contempt on all peoples, including the German, French racism was the most consistent, for it never fell into the weakness of patriotism. (This attitude did not change even during the last war; true, the "essence aryenne" no longer was a monopoly of the Germans but rather of the Anglo-Saxons, the Swedes, and the Nor-mans, but nation, patriotism, and law were still considered to be "prejudices, fictitious and nominal values.") * Even Taine believed firmly in the superior genius of the "Germanic nation," and Ernest Renan was probably the first to oppose the "Semites" to the "Aryans" in a decisive "division du genre humain," (39) although he held civilization to be the great superior force which destroys local originalities as well as original race differences. All the loose race talk so characteristic of French writers after 1870, even if they are not themselves racist in the strict sense of the word, follows pro-Germanic anti nationalist lines.
(39) In Gobineau's opinion, the Semites were a white hvbrid race bastardized by al mixture with blacks. For Renan see Histoire Générale et Système comparé des Langues, 1863, Part I, pp. 4, 503, and passim. The same distinction in his Langues Sémitiques.
^Feldman, Alex Mesibov (2023). "Chapter 4: Khazaria: The Exception Which Proves the Rules". In Raffensperger, Christian (ed.). How Medieval Europe was Ruled. Routledge. pp. 41–52. doi:10.4324/9781003213239-4. ISBN978-1032100166.