Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.

Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.
Argued December 8, 1993
Decided March 1, 1994
Full case nameJohn Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.
Citations510 U.S. 517 (more)
114 S. Ct. 1023; 127 L. Ed. 2d 455; 29 U.S.P.Q.2d 1881
Case history
PriorFantasy, Inc. v. Fogerty, 664 F. Supp. 1345 (N.D. Cal. 1987); affirmed, 984 F.2d 1524 (9th Cir. 1993); cert. granted, 509 U.S. 903 (1993).
Holding
In copyright suits, prevailing defendants receive attorney's fees solely at the court's discretion, just as prevailing plaintiffs do.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
Harry Blackmun · John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Case opinions
MajorityRehnquist, joined by Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg
ConcurrenceThomas
Laws applied
17 U.S.C. § 505

Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the standards governing awards of attorneys' fees in copyright cases. The Copyright Act of 1976 authorizes, but does not require, the court to award attorneys' fees to "the prevailing party" in a copyright action. In Fogerty, the Court held that such attorneys'-fees awards are discretionary, and that the same standards should be applied in the case of a prevailing plaintiff and a prevailing defendant.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search