Geduldig v. Aiello | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued March 26, 1974 Decided June 17, 1974 | |
Full case name | Geduldig v. Aiello et al. |
Citations | 417 U.S. 484 (more) 94 S.Ct 2485; 41 L. Ed. 256; 1974 U.S. LEXIS 23 |
Holding | |
Denial of benefits for work loss resulting from normal pregnancy does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stewart, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Douglas, Marshall |
Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974), was an equal protection case in the United States in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on whether unfavorable treatment to pregnant women could count as sex discrimination. It held that the denial of insurance benefits for work loss resulting from a normal pregnancy did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. The California insurance program at issue did not exclude workers from eligibility based on sex but excluded pregnancy from a list of compensable disabilities. The majority found that even though only women would be directly affected by the administrative decision, the classification of normal pregnancy as non-compensable was not a sex-based classification and so the court would defer to the state so long as it could provide a rational basis for its categorization.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search