Heckler v. Campbell | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued February 28, 1983 Decided May 16, 1983 | |
Full case name | Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Campbell |
Citations | 461 U.S. 458 (more) 103 S. Ct. 1952; 76 L. Ed. 2d 66; 1983 U.S. LEXIS 161; 51 U.S.L.W. 4561 |
Holding | |
The Court reversed the Second circuit saying that “[w]here the statute expressly entrusts the Secretary with the responsibility for implementing a provision by regulation, review is limited to determining whether the regulations promulgated exceeded the Secretary’s statutory authority and whether they are arbitrary and capricious.” | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Powell, joined by Burger, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor |
Concurrence | Brennan |
Concur/dissent | Marshall |
Laws applied | |
Social Security Act |
Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services could rely on published medical-vocational guidelines to determine a claimant’s right to Social Security benefits.[1][2]
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search