Intersectionality

An intersectional analysis considers a collection of factors that affect a social individual in combination, rather than considering each factor in isolation, as illustrated here using a Venn diagram.

Intersectionality is an analytical framework for understanding how groups' and individuals' social and political identities result in unique combinations of discrimination and privilege. Examples of these intersecting and overlapping factors include gender, caste, sex, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, religion, disability, physical appearance, and age.[1] These factors can lead to both empowerment and oppression.[2][3]

Intersectionality arose in reaction to both white feminism and the then male-dominated black liberation movement, citing the "interlocking oppressions" of racism, sexism and heteronormativity. It broadens the scope of the first and second waves of feminism, which largely focused on the experiences of women who were white, cisgender, and middle-class,[4] to include the different experiences of women of color, poor women, immigrant women, and other groups, and aims to separate itself from white feminism by acknowledging women's differing experiences and identities.[5]

The term intersectionality was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989.[6]: 385  She describes how interlocking systems of power affect those who are most marginalized in society.[6] Activists and academics use the framework to promote social and political egalitarianism.[5] Intersectionality opposes analytical systems that treat each axis of oppression in isolation. In this framework, for instance, discrimination against black women cannot be explained as a simple combination of misogyny and racism, but as something more complicated.[7]

Intersectionality has heavily influenced modern feminism and gender studies.[8] Its proponents suggest that it promotes a more nuanced and complex approach to addressing power and oppression, rather than offering simplistic answers.[9][8] Its critics suggest that the concept is too broad or complex,[10] tends to reduce individuals to specific demographic factors,[10][11] is used as an ideological tool,[12][11] and is difficult to apply in research contexts.[13][14][15]

  1. ^ Deckha, M. (November 2008). "Intersectionality and posthumanist visions of equality". Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society. XXIII (2).
  2. ^ Holley, Lynn C.; Mendoza, Natasha S.; Del-Colle, Melissa M.; Bernard, Marquita Lynette (2 April 2016). "Heterosexism, racism, and mental illness discrimination: Experiences of people with mental health conditions and their families". Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services. 28 (2): 93–116. doi:10.1080/10538720.2016.1155520. S2CID 147454725.
  3. ^ Zinn, Maxine Baca; Dill, Bonnie Thornton (1996). "Theorizing Difference from Multiracial Feminism". Feminist Studies. 22 (2): 321–331. doi:10.2307/3178416. hdl:2027/spo.0499697.0022.206. JSTOR 3178416. ProQuest 233181156 Gale A18800342.
  4. ^ bell hooks (2015). Ain't I a woman: Black women and feminism (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-82148-4. OCLC 886381091.
  5. ^ a b "What Does Intersectional Feminism Actually Mean?". International Women's Development Agency. 11 May 2018. Archived from the original on 23 April 2019.
  6. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Cooper 2016 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ Crenshaw, Kimberlé (October 2016). The urgency of intersectionality. TEDWomen 2016.
  8. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Jibrin 2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ Cite error: The named reference Davis 2008 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ a b Downing, Lisa (November 2018). "The body politic: Gender, the right wing and 'identity category violations'" (PDF). French Cultural Studies. 29 (4): 367–377. doi:10.1177/0957155818791075. S2CID 165115259.
  11. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Coaston 2019 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ^ Tomlinson, Barbara (Summer 2013). "To Tell the Truth and Not Get Trapped: Desire, Distance, and Intersectionality at the Scene of Argument". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 38 (4): 993–1017. doi:10.1086/669571. S2CID 144641071.
  13. ^ Cite error: The named reference Bauer2021 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ Cite error: The named reference Bright 2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  15. ^ Cite error: The named reference Guan 2021 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search