Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc.

Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc.
Court	United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Full case name	Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com
Argued	February 7, 2014
Reargued	March 8, 2015
Decided	May 31, 2016
Citation(s)	767 F.3d 894
Case history
Prior history	Appeal from C.D. Cal.
Holding
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not bar claims against online service providers regarding criminal offenses by their users.
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting	Mary M. Schroeder, Richard R. Clifton, Brian M. Cogan
Case opinions
Majority	Richard R. Clifton
Laws applied
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., 767 F.3d 894 (2014), is a 2014 ruling at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the legal liability of an Internet service provider for criminal offenses committed by its users.^[1] The ultimate ruling in the case has caused confusion over the amount of liability faced by service providers during such incidents.