Johan de Witt | |
---|---|
Grand Pensionary of Holland | |
In office 30 July 1653 – 4 August 1672 | |
Preceded by | Adriaan Pauw |
Succeeded by | Gaspar Fagel |
Pensionary of Dordrecht | |
In office 21 December 1650 – 30 July 1653 | |
Preceded by | Nicolaas Ruys |
Succeeded by | Govert van Slingelandt |
Personal details | |
Born | Dordrecht, Dutch Republic | 24 September 1625
Died | 20 August 1672 The Hague, Dutch Republic | (aged 46)
Political party | States' Party |
Spouse | |
Children | Johan de Witt Jr. |
Parent |
|
Relatives |
|
Alma mater | University of Leiden |
Signature | |
Johan de Witt (Dutch pronunciation: [ˈjoːɦɑn də ˈʋɪt]; 24 September 1625 – 20 August 1672), Lord of Zuid- en Noord-Linschoten, Snelrewaard, Hekendorp en IJsselvere, was a Dutch statesman and a major political figure in the Dutch Republic in the mid-17th century, the First Stadtholderless Period, when its flourishing sea trade in a period of global colonisation made the republic a leading European trading and seafaring power – now commonly referred to as the Dutch Golden Age. De Witt was elected Grand pensionary of Holland, and together with his uncle Cornelis de Graeff,[1] he controlled the Dutch political system from around 1650 until the Rampjaar (Disaster Year) of 1672.[2] This progressive cooperation between the two statesmen, and the consequent support of Amsterdam under the rule of De Graeff,[3] was an important political axis that organized the political system within the republic.[4]
As a leading republican of the Dutch States Party, De Witt opposed the House of Orange-Nassau and the Orangists and preferred a shift of power from the central government to the regenten. However, the Dutch Republic suffered numerous early defeats in the Rampjaar, due to an invasion of an alliance of England, France, and some German states. In the hysteria that followed the effortless invasion by an alliance of England, France, and some German states, he and his brother Cornelis de Witt were blamed and lynched in The Hague, with their corpses at least partially eaten by the rioters.[5][6][7][8] These cannibals were never prosecuted,[6] and some historians claim William of Orange may have incited them.[5]
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search