Johnson v. United States (2015)

Johnson v. United States
Argued November 5, 2014
Reargued April 20, 2015
Decided June 26, 2015
Full case nameSamuel James Johnson, Petitioner v. United States
Docket no.13-7120
Citations576 U.S. 591 (more)
135 S. Ct. 2551; 192 L. Ed. 2d 569
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
PriorUnited States v. Johnson, 526 F. App'x 708 (8th Cir. 2013); cert. granted, 572 U.S. 1059 (2014).
Holding
The Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague and as a result one's due process rights are violated.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
ConcurrenceKennedy (in judgment)
ConcurrenceThomas (in judgment)
DissentAlito
Laws applied
Armed Career Criminal Act 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1),
U.S. Const. amend. V
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
James v. United States (2007) (in part) & Sykes v. United States (2011) (in part)

Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled the Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act was unconstitutionally vague and in violation of due process.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search