Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Kingsley v. Hendrickson
Argued April 27, 2015
Decided June 22, 2015
Full case nameMichael B. Kingsley, Petitioner v. Stan Hendrickson, et al.
Docket no.14-6368
Citations576 U.S. 389 (more)
135 S. Ct. 2466; 192 L. Ed. 2d 416
Related casesBell v. Wolfish
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
PriorKingsley v. Josvai, 10-cv-832-bbc (W.D. Wis 2011); Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 744 F.3d 443 (7th Cir. 2014); cert. granted, 135 S. Ct. 1039 (2015).
SubsequentOn remand, 801 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2015).
Holding
A pretrial detainee's claim of the use of excessive force by a police officer must prove only that the force was objectively unreasonable, not necessarily prove that the officer thought the force was excessive. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityBreyer, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan
DissentScalia, joined by Roberts, Thomas
DissentAlito
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389 (2015), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held in a 5–4 decision that a pretrial detainee must prove only that force used by police is excessive according to an objective standard, not that a police officer was subjectively aware that the force used was unreasonable.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search