Lange v. California | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued February 24, 2021 Decided June 23, 2021 | |
Full case name | Lange v. California |
Docket no. | 20-18 |
Citations | 594 U.S. ___ (more) |
Holding | |
Under the Fourth Amendment, pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not always or categorically qualify as an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless entry into a home. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kagan, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett; Thomas (all but Part II–A) |
Concurrence | Kavanaugh |
Concurrence | Thomas (in part), joined by Kavanaugh (Part II) |
Concurrence | Roberts (in judgment), joined by Alito |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV |
Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search