Law v. Siegel | |
---|---|
Argued January 13, 2014 Decided March 4, 2014 | |
Full case name | Stephen Law, Petitioner v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee |
Docket no. | 12-5196 |
Citations | 571 U.S. 415 (more) 134 S. Ct. 1188; 188 L. Ed. 2d 146 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | Law v. Siegel (In re Law), 435 Fed. App'x 697 (9th Cir. 2011)., affirming In re Law, 2009 WL 7751415 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 2009)., affirming In re Law, 401 B.R. 447 (Bkrtcy. Ct. CD Cal. 2009)., cert. granted, 570 U.S. 904 (2013). |
Holding | |
Whatever other sanctions a bankruptcy court may impose on a dishonest debtor, it may not contravene express provisions of the Bankruptcy Code by ordering that the debtor’s exempt property be used to pay debts and expenses for which that property is not liable under the Code. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
11 U.S.C. § 105 (power of the bankruptcy court), 11 U.S.C. § 522 (exemptions from bankrupt estate) |
Law v. Siegel, 571 U.S. 415 (2014), is a ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States that describes the extent of the powers of bankruptcy courts in dealing with the bad faith of debtors.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search