Law v. Siegel

Law v. Siegel
Argued January 13, 2014
Decided March 4, 2014
Full case nameStephen Law, Petitioner v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee
Docket no.12-5196
Citations571 U.S. 415 (more)
134 S. Ct. 1188; 188 L. Ed. 2d 146
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorLaw v. Siegel (In re Law), 435 Fed. App'x 697 (9th Cir. 2011)., affirming In re Law, 2009 WL 7751415 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 2009)., affirming In re Law, 401 B.R. 447 (Bkrtcy. Ct. CD Cal. 2009)., cert. granted, 570 U.S. 904 (2013).
Holding
Whatever other sanctions a bankruptcy court may impose on a dishonest debtor, it may not contravene express provisions of the Bankruptcy Code by ordering that the debtor’s exempt property be used to pay debts and expenses for which that property is not liable under the Code.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityScalia, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
11 U.S.C. § 105 (power of the bankruptcy court), 11 U.S.C. § 522 (exemptions from bankrupt estate)

Law v. Siegel, 571 U.S. 415 (2014), is a ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States that describes the extent of the powers of bankruptcy courts in dealing with the bad faith of debtors.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search