Montejo v. Louisiana

Montejo v. Louisiana
Argued January 13, 2009
Decided May 26, 2009
Full case nameJesse Jay Montejo, Petitioner v. Louisiana
Docket no.07-1529
Citations556 U.S. 778 (more)
129 S. Ct. 2079; 173 L. Ed. 2d 955; 2009 U.S. LEXIS 3973
Case history
Prioraffirmed 974 So. 2d 1238 (La. 2008), vacated and remanded
Holding
A defendant may validly waive his right to counsel for police interrogation, even if police initiate the interrogation after the defendant's 6th Amendment right to counsel had attached at an arraignment or similar proceeding. Michigan v. Jackson is overruled.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
ConcurrenceAlito, joined by Kennedy
DissentStevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg; Breyer (except footnote 5)
DissentBreyer
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. VI
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986)

Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009), is a 5–4 decision by the United States Supreme Court that overruled the Court's decision in Michigan v. Jackson.[1] The case concerned the validity of a defendant's waiver of his right to counsel during a police interrogation. In reversing Jackson, the Court said such a waiver was valid.[2]

  1. ^ Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986).
  2. ^ Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009). Public domain This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search