| National Pork Producers Council v. Ross | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued October 11, 2022 Decided May 11, 2023 | |
| Full case name | National Pork Producers Council, et al. v. Karen Ross, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food & Agriculture, et al. |
| Docket no. | 21-468 |
| Citations | 598 U.S. 356 (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Motion to dismiss and motion for judgment on the pleadings granted, 456 F.Supp.3d 1201 (S.D. Cal. 2020); affirmed, 6 F.4th 1021 (9th Cir. 2021); cert. granted, 596 U.S. ___ (2022). |
| Holding | |
| Affirmed the lower courts, dismissing the case and allowing the law to stand. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Gorsuch (Parts I, II, III, IV–A, and V), joined by Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett |
| Plurality | Gorsuch (Parts IV–B and IV–D), joined by Thomas and Barrett |
| Plurality | Gorsuch (Part IV–C), joined by Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan |
| Concurrence | Sotomayor (in part), joined by Kagan |
| Concurrence | Barrett (in part) |
| Concur/dissent | Roberts, joined by Alito, Kavanaugh, Jackson |
| Concur/dissent | Kavanaugh |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. art I, § 8, cl. 3 | |
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, 598 U.S. 356 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the Dormant Commerce Clause.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search