The perennial sources list[a] (abbreviated as RSP or WP:RSP) is a community-maintained list on English Wikipedia that classifies sources by degrees of reliability.[2][3] The ratings, which are determined through public discussion and consensus, have received significant news coverage over the years.[4][5][6]
RSP ratings are not meant to function as "pre-approved sources that can always be used without regard for the ordinary rules of editing", nor is RSP a "list of banned sources that can never be used or should be removed on sight".[3][5]
- ^ Merid, Feven (13 March 2025). "Wikipedia's Reluctant Resisters". Columbia Journalism Review. Archived from the original on 1 May 2025. Retrieved 3 June 2025.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Lawrence-2024was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Talbot, Margaret (4 March 2025). "Elon Musk Also Has a Problem with Wikipedia". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Archived from the original on 1 May 2025. Retrieved 3 May 2025.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Bandler-2024was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Harrison, Stephen (1 July 2021). "Wikipedia's War on the Daily Mail". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Archived from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2025.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Breslow-2022was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search