Proportionality for solid coalitions

Proportionality for solid coalitions (PSC) is a fairness criterion for ranked voting systems. It is an adaptation of the proportional representation criterion to voting systems in which there are no parties, the voters can vote directly for candidates, and can rank candidates in any way they want. This criterion was proposed by the British philosopher and logician Michael Dummett.[1][2]

PSC is a weak definition of proportionality, which only guarantees proportional representation for cloned candidates, also called solid coalitions. In other words, voters must rank all candidates of their own faction first (before candidates of other parties) to ensure their faction is adequately represented. On the other hand, PSC does not guarantee proportional representation if voters rank candidates of different parties together (as they will no longer form a solid coalition). As a result, PSC systems like the single transferable vote[3] can become disproportional if there are substantial cross-cutting cleavages.[4][5][6]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ D. R. Woodall: Monotonicity of single-seat preferential election rules. Discrete Applied Mathematics 77 (1997), p. 83–84.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference :1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference :BP23 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference Tideman was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ Aziz, Haris; Lee, Barton (2018-06-04). "The Expanding Approvals Rule: Improving Proportional Representation and Monotonicity". arXiv:1708.07580 [cs.GT].

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search