Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued March 18, 1980 Decided June 9, 1980 | |
Full case name | Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins |
Citations | 447 U.S. 74 (more) 100 S.Ct. 2035; 64 L. Ed. 2d 741; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 129 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Ctr., 23 Cal. 3d 899, 153 Cal. Rptr. 854, 592 P.2d 341 (1979). |
Holding | |
A state can prohibit the private owner of a shopping center from using state trespass law to exclude peaceful expressive activity in the open areas of the shopping center. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Stevens (in full); White, Powell (in part); Blackmun (in part) |
Concurrence | Marshall |
Concurrence | White (in part) |
Concurrence | Powell, joined by White (in part) |
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell, California, and several local high school students (who wished to canvass signatures for a petition against United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379).[1][2]
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search