Self-report inventory

A self-report inventory is a type of psychological test in which a person fills out a survey or questionnaire with or without the help of an investigator.[1] Self-report inventories often ask direct questions about personal interests, values, symptoms, behaviors, and traits or personality types. Inventories are different from tests in that there is no objectively correct answer; responses are based on opinions and subjective perceptions. Most self-report inventories are brief and can be taken or administered within five to 15 minutes, although some, such as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), can take several hours to fully complete.[2] They are popular because they can be inexpensive to give and to score, and their scores can often show good reliability.[3]

There are three major approaches to developing self-report inventories: theory-guided, factor analysis, and criterion-keyed. Theory-guided inventories are constructed around a theory of personality or a prototype of a construct. Factor analysis uses statistical methods to organize groups of related items into subscales. Criterion-keyed inventories include questions that have been shown to statistically discriminate between a comparison group and a criterion group, such as people with clinical diagnoses of depression versus a control group.[4]

Items may use any of several formats: a Likert scale with ranked options, true-false, or forced choice, although other formats such as sentence completion or visual analog scales are possible. True-false involves questions that the individual denotes as either being true or false about themselves. Forced-choice is a set of statements that require the individual to choose one as being most representative of themselves.[5]

If the inventory includes items from different factors or constructs, the items can be mixed together or kept in groups. Sometimes the way people answer the item will change depending on the context offered by the neighboring items.[6] Concerns have been raised about the validity of short self-report scales.[7]

  1. ^ "Evaluation of the National Mental Health Strategy: Final Report". PsycEXTRA Dataset. 1997. doi:10.1037/e676382010-001
  2. ^ Butcher, James N; Perry, Julia N (2008-03-20), "Introduction to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2)", Personality Assessment in Treatment Planning, Oxford University PressNew York, NY, pp. 23–47, ISBN 978-0-19-533097-7, retrieved 2025-02-15
  3. ^ Clark, Lee Anna; Watson, David (1995). "Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development". Psychological Assessment. 7 (3): 309–319.
  4. ^ Hinkin, Timothy R. (1998). "A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires". Organizational Research Methods. 1 (1): 104–121. doi:10.1177/109442819800100106. hdl:1813/72304. ISSN 1094-4281.
  5. ^ Hinkin, Timothy R. (1998). "A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires". Organizational Research Methods. 1 (1): 104–121. doi:10.1177/109442819800100106. hdl:1813/72304. ISSN 1094-4281.
  6. ^ Reise, Steven P.; Ainsworth, Andrew T.; Haviland, Mark G. (2005). "Item Response Theory". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 14 (2): 95–101. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00342.x. ISSN 0963-7214.
  7. ^ Smith, Gregory T.; McCarthy, Denis M.; Anderson, Kristen G. (2000). "On the sins of short-form development". Psychological Assessment. 12 (1): 102–111. ISSN 1040-3590.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search