Shammai

Mausoleum with two loculus graves at Khirbet Shema' on Mount Meron,[1] dated to the Late Roman and Early Byzantine periods, and identified by a medieval tradition as the tomb of Shammai.[2]

Shammai (c. 50 BCE – c. 30 CE, Hebrew: שַׁמַּאי, Šammaʾy) was a Jewish scholar of the 1st century, and an important figure in Judaism's core work of rabbinic literature, the Mishnah.

Shammai was the most eminent contemporary of Hillel. His teachings mostly agree with those of Hillel, except on three issues.[3] Both were divided over an earlier rabbinic dispute, regarding the actual laying on of hands upon a sacrificial animal on a Festival Day, which Hillel permitted.[4] Their disciples, who had differing views to their masters, disputed many other halakhic matters.[4] The School of Shammai, founded by Shammai, is almost invariably mentioned along with the School of Hillel, founded by Hillel. They differed fundamentally from each other. Although they were contemporaries, Hillel was nearly sixty years old at the time of Shammai's birth.

Hillel and Shammai were leaders of two opposing schools of thought, known as the House of Hillel and the House of Shammai. While the terms "liberal" and "conservative" may not perfectly capture the nuances of their positions, Hillel is generally considered to have been more lenient or flexible in his interpretations of Jewish law compared to Shammai. For instance, in matters such as divorce and Sabbath observance, Hillel often took a more permissive approach, emphasizing compassion and practicality. On the other hand, Shammai tended to be more stringent in his interpretations, prioritizing strict adherence to the law.

  1. ^ "Virtual World Project (Creighton University)". Retrieved 1 March 2019.
  2. ^ Eric Meyers (2014). Steven Fine; Aaron Koller (eds.). The Use of Archaeology in Understanding Rabbinic Materials: An Archaeological Perspective. Studia Judaica (Book 73). Walter de Gruyter. pp. 312–313. ISBN 9781614514855. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  3. ^ Babylonian Talmud (Shabbat 15a), where it says that they disputed only in three matters: a) the amount of flour needed to constitute the separation of the dough-portion; b) the amount of drawn water that would disqualify a ritual bath (mikveh); c) whether or not a woman who had her natural purgation is able to defile foods through touch retrospectively.
  4. ^ a b Jerusalem Talmud (Hagigah 2:2 [10b; 12a])

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search