Smiley v. Holm | |
---|---|
Argued March 16–17, 1932 Decided April 11, 1932 | |
Full case name | W. Yale Smiley v. Holm, as Secretary of State of Minnesota |
Citations | 285 U.S. 355 (more) |
Holding | |
The U.S. Constitution does not forbid a governor from vetoing a redistricting proposal passed by the state legislature. Minnesota Supreme Court decision reversed. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Hughes, joined by unanimous |
Cardozo took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. art. I, § 4, cl. 1 |
Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355 (1932), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving a governor's power to veto a congressional redistricting proposal passed by a state's legislature. In an opinion by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Court unanimously held that the U.S. Constitution did not prohibit Minnesota's governor from vetoing that state's redistricting map.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search