Smith v. City of Jackson

Smith v. City of Jackson
Argued November 3, 2004
Decided March 30, 2005
Full case nameAzel P. Smith, et al., Petitioners v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, et al.
Docket no.03-1160
Citations544 U.S. 228 (more)
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityStevens (Parts I, II, IV), joined by Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
PluralityStevens (Part III), joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
ConcurrenceScalia (in part and judgment)
ConcurrenceO'Connor (in judgment), joined by Kennedy, Thomas
Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967

Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 2005. It concerned the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) and the disparate impact theory. The Court held that although the theory of disparate impact set forth in Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) is also applicable under the ADEA, the ADEA is narrower as it permits “otherwise prohibited” actions “where the differentiation is based on reasonable factors other than age.” [1][2][3]

  1. ^ 544 U.S. 228
  2. ^ "Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005)". Justia Law. Retrieved August 26, 2023.
  3. ^ "29 CFR § 1625.7 - Differentiations based on reasonable factors other than age". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved August 26, 2023.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search