South Carolina v. Baker | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued December 7, 1987 Decided April 20, 1988 | |
Full case name | South Carolina v. Baker, Secretary of the Treasury on Exceptions to Report of Special Master |
Citations | 485 U.S. 505 (more) 108 S. Ct. 1355; 99 L. Ed. 2d 592 |
Holding | |
Section 310(b)(1) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) does not violate the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, nor violates the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity by taxing the interest earned on unregistered state bonds. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens; Scalia (except part II) |
Concurrence | Stevens |
Concurrence | Scalia (in part) |
Concurrence | Rehnquist (in judgment) |
Dissent | O'Connor |
Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend X; Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 | |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429 (1895) (in part) |
South Carolina v. Baker, 485 U.S. 505 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that section 310(b)(1) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) does not violate the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search