The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelidtalk 18:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Article move to mainspace new enough and article long enough. non-English sources taken as AGF and reliable. No policy issues could be identified in the article and not areas of close paraphrasing were seen. both hooks are verified. Image is unfortunately blurry at both thumb and zoom. Looks good to go.--Kevmin§ 17:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)