Tone (literature)

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Tone" literature – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In literature, the tone of a literary work expresses the writer's attitude toward or feelings about the subject matter and audience.^{[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]}

The concept of a work's tone has been argued in the academic context as involving a critique of one's innate emotions: the creator or creators of an artistic piece deliberately pushing one to rethink the emotional dimensions of one's own life due to the creator or creator's psychological intent.^[1]

As the nature of commercial media and other such artistic expressions have evolved over time, the concept of a work's tone requiring analysis has been applied to other actions such as film production. For example, a study of French New Wave movement occurred during the spring of 1974 in the pages of Film Quarterly commenting upon particular directors such as Jean-Luc Godard and Francois Truffaut, noting "the passionate concern for the status of... emotional life" that "pervades the films" they'd made. Highlighting those creative figures, the journal found that the career path of such a filmmaker "treats intimacy, and its opposite, distance, in a unique way" that "focuses on the dialectic between" those contrasts as "they conjugate each other" and so the directors' social movement "uses intimacy as the dominant feeling-tone of its films" (emphasis added) thus.^[1]