Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh

Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh
Argued February 22, 2023
Decided May 18, 2023
Full case nameTwitter, Inc., et al., v. Mehier Taamneh, et al.
Docket no.21-1496
Citations598 U.S. 471 (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Holding
Respondents' allegations that Twitter aided and abetted ISIS in its terrorist attack on the Reina nightclub fail to state a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2333(d)(2).
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
MajorityThomas, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceJackson
Laws applied
Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act

Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh, 598 U.S. 471 (2023), was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. The case considered whether Internet service providers are liable for "aiding and abetting" a designated foreign terrorist organization in an "act of international terrorism", on account of recommending such content posted by users, under Section 2333 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.[1] Along with Gonzalez v. Google LLC, Taamneh is one of two cases where social media companies are accused of aiding and abetting terrorism in violation of the law. The cases were decided together in a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which ruled that Taamneh's case could proceed.[2] The cases challenge the broad liability immunity for hosting and recommending terrorist content that websites have enjoyed.[3]

The unanimous court ruled in May 2023 that the charges brought against Twitter and other companies were not permissible under the Antiterrorism Act, and did not address the Section 230 question. This decision also supported the Court's per curiam decision in Gonzalez returning that case to the lower court for review in light of the Twitter decision.[4]

  1. ^ Robertson, Adi (October 3, 2022). "The Supreme Court will determine whether you can sue platforms for hosting terrorists". The Verge. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
  2. ^ Cushing, Tim (June 30, 2021). "Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Says Some Disturbing Stuff About Section 230 While Dumping Another Two 'Sue Twitter For Terrorism' Lawsuits". Techdirt. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
  3. ^ Stohr, Greg (October 3, 2022). "Social Media Company Liability Draws Supreme Court Scrutiny". Bloomberg News. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
  4. ^ Hurley, Lawrence (May 18, 2023). "Supreme Court sidesteps ruling on scope of internet companies' immunity from lawsuits over user content". NBC News. Retrieved May 18, 2023.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search