United States v. Cook | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Decided May 4, 1874 | |
Full case name | United States v. George Cook |
Citations | 86 U.S. 591 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | Certificate of division, C.C.E.D. Wis. |
Holding | |
Indian tribes do not own the land their reservations are on, the land is owned by the United States and the Indians only have a right to occupy the land. They may not cut and sell timber merely for the purpose of selling timber, they may only sell timber that was cut incidental to another purpose. The government has a right to take action to recover damages for timber sold illegally from that land. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Waite, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Common law decision, based on replevin, waste, and Indian right of occupancy | |
Superseded by | |
Statute, 25 U.S.C. §§ 406–407, as stated in United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (1983). |
United States v. Cook, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 591 (1873), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Indian tribes do not own the land their reservations are on, the land is owned by the United States and the Indians only have a right to occupy the land. They may not cut and sell timber merely for the purpose of selling timber, they may only sell timber that was cut incidental to another purpose. The government has a right to take action to recover damages for timber sold illegally from that land.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search