Why does Wikipedia seem to go out of its way to antagonize contributors? The two deleted pages below were never published. They just contained information for possible future articles that had not yet been fully researched and written. But the language used to justify their deletion was largely written as a personal attack on me. This is not the first time that justifications have been poorly written, it seems to be the norm. In fact, Wikipedia's masters seem to take great delight in publicly chastising it contributors for not getting every arcane rule and procedure absolutely correct each and every time. Clearly, the volunteer efforts of its most lowly contributors are neither appreciated nor valued. It's time that Wikipedia exercised some editorial control over such messages to ensure than the tone and content is more constructive and less accusatory in nature. See also http://motherboard.vice.com/read/wikipedia-editor-says-sites-toxic-community-has-him-contemplating-suicide
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search