The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Back in 2009, the community first enacted a restriction on mass creation of articles. The resulting policy was placed in WP:Bot policy since the impetus was mass creation using automated tooling. Even then concern was raised over whether WP:BRFA was the right forum for this, but at the time "good enough" carried the day.
In the years since we've had various discussions where this has become an issue. Possibly the most prominent was Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Requests for comment/Article creation at scale/Closing statement#Question 17: Amend WP:MASSCREATE, where three of the seven "oppose" bullets hinge on WP:BOTPOL being the wrong place. Personally I'm tired of seeing WP:BOTPOL and WP:MEATBOT being bent out of shape in the arguments over what sorts of not-entirely-bot mass creations are or can be "covered" by WP:MASSCREATE. Thus I propose the question: Should WP:MASSCREATE be severed from WP:Bot policy? 23:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Proposal to revise CSD R3
Should speedy deletion criterion R3 be revised to better address redirects in a language other than English? — Scott • talk 16:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Edit filter manager
Should the Wikipedia:Edit filter manager page be promoted to a procedural policy? EggRoll97 (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Titles of European monarchs
In the absence of a need to disambiguate, how should we title the articles of European imperial and royal monarchs?
If you support multiple options, please rank your preferences to assist the closer in identifying consensus. 22:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Selective scoping
Do you support the enactment of WP:SCOPING as an official policy on Wikipedia? 9t5 (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search