• Deliens (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Atelier Brückner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Everyone,

I have problems with Submitting my Draft for the English Version of the Atelier Brückner Wikipedia Page

We have also a German Wikipedia Site for the Company: Atelier Brückner

Its got declined 2 Times, What should i do to fix it???

Because we need urgently due a Opening an English Wikipedia Site of ATELIER BRÜCKNER

Best Regards,

Deliens Deliens (talk) 11:01, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deliens, A few things. First of all, The German Wikipedia is completely independent and separate for the English one. Secondly, You do not need an article "urgently".

The biggest problem is that it has no references. We do not care about what the company has to say about itself, we want to know what other independent reliable sources say about the company. Also please remove all of the external links from the body of the article (the links beside the awards and projects). CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 11:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deliens If you have any association with the subject please disclose that. You don't really "urgently" need an article(at most, you can "urgently" need to improve a really bad article, but that's off topic). Thehistorianisaac (talk) 01:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Smhfba (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Michael A. Celia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have created a page for Prof. Michael A. Celia. How do I add his photo to it? Smhfba (talk) 14:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Smhfba: do you own the copyright to the photo, or do you know for sure that it is not covered by copyright? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Smhfba: Ignore the photo for now. Images don't help drafts a whit (if anything, they are more likely to damage it) as the reviewers are looking more at your sources and article text. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2601:188:C07E:360:30CA:268B:331A:2D75 (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Bellweather Community Credit Union (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

After multiple denials, I'd like to get a clearer reasoning other than the sources. I've added multiple that fit the necessary categories and just would like a clearer path to getting this approved. 2601:188:C07E:360:30CA:268B:331A:2D75 (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are the editor that created that draft- remember to log in when posting.

Press releases and routine announcements of business activities do not establish that this CU meets the definition of a notable organization.

The issue that you are having is that you are telling us what the credit union wants us to know about itself- which should be done on its own website, not here. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources have chosen on their own to say about a topic, not what it wants to say about itself. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Raventoarokasiojack (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Classtro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

i want to write about this person , he has very interesting stuff and im a big fan of his work Raventoarokasiojack (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. You only provide their own website and IMDB as sources, neither of which are acceptable sources. IMDB is user-generated. See reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Matthew John Drummond (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:A Dangerous Kind of Love (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This page is in trouble. Matthew John Drummond (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Do you have a question about it? 331dot (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Therian Controls (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:BluePoint Alert Solutions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Finding info, correcting any issues, & finding sources Therian Controls (talk) 19:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Therian Controls You have just expressed with precision that which you need to do. You have not, however, asked a question of us. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Therian Controls (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:BluePoint Alert Solutions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Cannot find any other sources as of writing this besides the official website (www.bluepointalert.com) and most sources seem to have the same info Therian Controls (talk) 19:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Therian Controls: Then you don't have the sources to support an article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 19:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weavingowl (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Melvin Vopson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not understanding why the article is getting declined..first reviewing user said it was because it failed to meet academic notability, then when edited to fall into general notability category, same reviewing user declined it again saying that all of the articles i used cast doubt on his claims, which was not true - only one did and that was included in a criticism section which i thought offered good balance to such a claim.

https://en.wikipedia.orgview_html.php?sq=5g&lang=en&q=Draft:Melvin_Vopson Weavingowl (talk) 19:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Weavingowl The reviewer gave solid regions behind their thinking. Have you engaged in a dialogue with them? 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Fahhxkjajfesiu (talk · contribs) ^(TB)
  • Draft:Violette1st (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'd like to know where I should get information from, because the YouTube channel and fandom are the only places that information exists. Fahhxkjajfesiu (talk) 21:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fahhxkjajfesiu: - We're looking for in-depth, non-routine, independent-of-the-subject news/review sources that discuss the subject at length, are written by identifiable authors, and are subject to fact-checking and other forms of robust editorial oversight. If those sources do not exist - and their YT channel (connexion to subject) and Fandom/Wikia (no editorial oversight) do not count - we can't even consider having an article for lack of sources to summarise. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 21:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's simple:

If those are the only sources that exist, the subject is not meant to have an article (for now) Thehistorianisaac (talk) 00:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]