Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education in Canada/Archive1

I'm gonna really need help with this project, folks, so any would be appreciated. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 19:37, 23 October 2005 (UTC) — copied from WikiProject Education in Canada/General Usgnus 17:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came across the University of Calgary Students' Union page because it had a "need wikification" tag on it. It looks pretty good, though. I would have just removed the tag, but since it's part of this project I thought I'd check in with you first... is it up to your standards, or is there something I can do to wiki it up better? Red Robot 05:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC) — copied from WikiProject Education in Canada/General Usgnus 17:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been some sort of conensus to create this project. I notice that Template:WPEIC-cat indicates a variety of categories are now "maintained" by this project. It doesn't simply suggest talking about changes here, it indicates the category is actually maintained by this project. Perhaps I missed some discussion. Anyway, please point me to it, or I feel the template should be removed or reworded. --rob 11:35, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am certainly open to it being reworded, what do you have in mind? --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy No ads on Wikipedia. 16:31, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and changed Template:WPEIC-cat to be somewhat softer, take a look. Although, I'm not sure if the wording is good enough. I don't understand the the reason for adding the template, at this stage, especially with a red-link for "proposals". I've gone ahead in the past, and made sub-categories within these "maintained/related" categories, and will do so again without "checking in", since there's nothing here (yet) to check with. Also, one needn't make a "proposal" if doing something obvious like Category:Elementary schools in Province/Territory given there are only five sub-cats of Category:Elementary schools in Canada currently. Making such sub-cats when the article member of each one is created (no sooner or later), would be the best approach. Suggesting some standardized rules for categories is probably a good idea, but where obvious patterns exist, this project should just document what they are, and welcome people to go ahead and make them. --rob 19:35, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]