Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. | |
---|---|
Argued April 25, 1977 Decided June 28, 1977 | |
Full case name | Hugo Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company |
Citations | 433 U.S. 562 (more) 97 S. Ct. 2849; 53 L. Ed. 2d 965; 1977 U.S. LEXIS 145; 205 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 741; 40 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1485; 5 Ohio Op. 3d 215; 2 Media L. Rep. 2089 |
Case history | |
Prior | Ohio Supreme Court, 47 Ohio St.2d 224, 351 N.E.2d 454 (1976), reversed; cert. granted 429 U.S. 1037 (1977) |
Holding | |
The First and Fourteenth Amendments do not immunize the news media from civil liability when they broadcast a performer's entire act without his consent, nor does the Constitution prevent a State from requiring broadcasters to compensate performers. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | White, joined by Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist |
Dissent | Powell, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
Dissent | Stevens |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const., Amends. I and XIV |
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (1977), was an important U.S. Supreme Court case concerning rights of publicity.[1] The Court held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments do not immunize the news media from civil liability when they broadcast a performer's entire act without his consent, and the Constitution does not prevent a state from requiring broadcasters to compensate performers. It was the first time (and so far the only time) the Supreme Court heard a case on rights of publicity.[2]
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search