The Civil Rights Cases | |
---|---|
Decided 15 October, 1883 | |
Full case name | United States v. Stanley; United States v. Ryan; United States v. Nichols; United States v. Singleton; Robinson et ux. v. Memphis & Charleston R.R. Co. |
Citations | 109 U.S. 3 (more) 3 S. Ct. 18; 27 L. Ed. 835 |
Holding | |
Neither the Thirteenth nor Fourteenth Amendments empower Congress to safeguard blacks against the actions of private individuals. To decide otherwise would afford blacks a special status under the law that whites did not enjoy.[1] | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Bradley, joined by Waite, Miller, Field, Woods, Matthews, Gray, Blatchford |
Dissent | Harlan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. XIII, XIV; Civil Rights Act of 1875 |
The Civil Rights Cases 109 U.S. 3 (1883), were a group of five similar cases consolidated into one issue for the United States Supreme Court to review.[2] The Court held that Congress lacked the constitutional authority under the Fourteenth Amendment to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals and organizations, rather than state and local governments.[3]
The Court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which provided that "all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges of inns, public conveyances on land or water, theaters, and other places of public amusement; subject only to the conditions and limitations established by law, and applicable alike to citizens of every race and color, regardless of any previous condition of servitude" was unconstitutional.[3]
FOLD20131023
was used but no text was provided for refs named (see the help page).
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search