SEC v. Ralston Purina Co.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.
Argued April 28, 1953
Decided June 8, 1953
Full case nameSecurities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.
Citations346 U.S. 119 (more)
73 S. Ct. 981; 97 L. Ed. 1494; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2688
Case history
PriorOn a complaint brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission under § 20 (b) of the Securities Act of 1933, seeking to enjoin respondent's unregistered offerings of its stock to its employees, the District Court held the exemption of § 4 (1) applicable and dismissed the suit. 102 F. Supp. 964. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 200 F.2d 85. The Supreme Court granted certiorari. 345 US. 903.
Holding
SEC
Court membership
Chief Justice
Fred M. Vinson
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
Case opinion
MajorityClark, joined by Vinson, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Minton
Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Securities Act of 1933, § 4(1)

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953),[1] was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a corporation offering "key employees" equity stock shares is eligible for a transaction-based exemption from securities registration under Section 4(1) [Now Section 4(a)(2)] of the Securities Act of 1933. This exemption would generally not apply when offered to all employees, including rank-and-file employees, as the investors should be "sophisticated investors."

  1. ^ SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953).

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search