Herrera v. Wyoming

Herrera v. Wyoming
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 8, 2019 Decided May 20, 2019
Full case name	Clayvin Herrera v. Wyoming
Docket no.	17-532
Citations	587 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 1686; 203 L. Ed. 2d 846
Decision	Opinion
Case history
Prior	Cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 2707 (2018).
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinions
Majority	Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Gorsuch
Dissent	Alito, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Ward v. Race Horse (1896)

Herrera v. Wyoming, No. 17-532, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Wyoming's statehood did not void the Crow Tribe's right to hunt on "unoccupied lands of the United States" under an 1868 treaty, and that the Bighorn National Forest did not automatically become "occupied" when the forest was created.^[1][2]