Hyde Amendment (1997)

The Hyde Amendment (Pub.L. 105-119, § 617, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2519, codified as a note following 18 U.S.C. § 3006A) is a federal statute allowing federal courts to award attorneys' fees and court costs to criminal defendants "where the court finds that the position of the United States was 'vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith'".[1][2] In such cases, the federal court may allow victims to recover some of the costs they incurred in fighting the government's investigation and prosecution by authorizing an award of attorneys' fees and court costs to a criminal defendant when the prosecution's evidence is so baseless as to be "frivolous."[3] Compensation awarded under this statute would come out of the budget of the specific federal agency involved, typically the United States Attorney's Office.[4]

The measure was introduced by Representative Henry Hyde (Republican-Illinois) as a rider to an appropriation bill and worked into the final 1997 Department of Justice bill by the United States Congress. The Justice Department was intensely opposed to the statute.[5]

  1. ^ "Criminal Tax Bulletin - Title 26 and Title 26 Related Cases" (PDF). October 19, 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2004. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  2. ^ Shackford, Scott (2012-11-14) Supreme Court Declines to Tackle Prosecutorial Misconduct Case, Reason
  3. ^ "Fighting Back: Remedies for the wrongfully prosecuted?". September 1998. Retrieved 2007-11-10.
  4. ^ "Power, policy, and the Hyde Amendment: ensuring sound judicial interpretation of the criminal attorneys' fees law". 1999. Retrieved 2007-11-10.
  5. ^ McCoy, Kevin and Heath, Brad (2010-09-28) Not guilty, but stuck with big bills, damaged career, USA Today

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search