Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations

Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations
Argued March 20, 1973
Decided June 21, 1973
Full case namePittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations
Citations413 U.S. 376 (more)
93 S. Ct. 2553; 37 L. Ed. 2d 669
Case history
PriorPittsburgh Press Emp't Adver. Discrimination Appeal, 4 Pa. Commw. 448, 287 A.2d 161 (Commw. Ct. 1972)
SubsequentRehearing denied, 414 U.S. 881 (1973).
Holding
A Pittsburgh ordinance, as construed to forbid newspapers to carry sex-designated advertising columns for nonexempt job opportunities, does not violate petitioner's First Amendment rights
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Case opinions
MajorityPowell, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Rehnquist, White
DissentBurger
DissentDouglas
DissentStewart, joined by Douglas
DissentBlackmun

Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 (1973), is a 1973 decision of the United States Supreme Court which upheld an ordinance enacted in Pittsburgh that forbids sex-designated classified advertising for job opportunities, against a claim by the parent company of the Pittsburgh Press that the ordinance violated its First Amendment rights.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search