Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers (1986) Ltd and others

Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers (1986) Ltd and others
CourtCourt of Appeal of England and Wales
Full case nameEsther Louise Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers (1986) Ltd., Brian Radford, Richard Stott and Mirror Group Newspapers plc.
Decided31 March 1993 (1993-03-31)
Citation(s)[1993] EWCA Civ 16, [1993] 4 All ER 975
Case history
Appealed fromQueen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales
Court membership
Judges sittingLord Justice Neill, Lord Justice Staughton, Lord Justice Roch
Keywords
libel

Esther Louise Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers (1986) Ltd., Brian Radford, Richard Stott and Mirror Group Newspapers plc. [1993] EWCA Civ 16, [1993] 4 All ER 975, also shortened to Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers by legal analysts,[1] is a 1993 English defamation court case. The case was brought by the television presenter Esther Rantzen against Mirror Group Newspapers, publisher of The People which had alleged that Rantzen had protected a child abuser after he had given information about child abuse in a school.

The jury in the case at the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales found for Rantzen and awarded her £250,000 in damages. The defendants appealed the award to the Court of Appeal of England and Wales where the award was reduced to £110,000 as the court ruled that the damages awarded by the jury had been disproportionate.[2]

  1. ^ Spilsbury, Sallie (2013). Media Law. Routledge. p. 141. ISBN 978-1135343507.
  2. ^ Tan, Ying-Hui (22 October 2011). "Law Report: Excessive libel damages cut: Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers and others. Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Neill, Lord Justice Staughton and Lord Justice Roch)". The Independent. Retrieved 11 May 2018.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search